This blog covers all the latest updates on Nuclear weapons and the politics surrounding them.

Monday, August 9, 2010

Russia and Iran to sign energy "road map"


July 13, 2010
Reuters
Russia said on Tuesday it planned to sign a road map to outline future energy cooperation withIran.
Russian oil and gas majors Gazprom, Gazprom Neft and LUKOIL, have signed billions of dollars worth of deals to help Iran develop its oil and gas fields but most projects are on holding because of sanctions.
The document will be signed on Wednesday when Iranian Oil Minister Massoud Mirkazemi meets his Russian counterpart Sergei Shmatko in Moscow, the oil ministry said without providing details.
At best, analysts said, it will reflect Russia's efforts to walk a safe path between international sanctions and Moscow's wish to maintain ties with a fellow oil and gas power.
"The ministers will discuss the current situation in Russia-Iranian energy cooperation and will outline prospects for future cooperation," the statement said.
"The ministries will study issues linked to the creation of favorable conditions to intensify and make cooperation in the energy sphere between Iran and Russia more concrete," it added.
Russia voted for sanctions in the United Nations Security Council on June 9 that target the Islamic Republic banking and shipping sectors because ofIran's failure to allay fears over its disputed nuclear programme.
"Russian companies are taking a cautious approach to this country at this moment they don't want to engage in politically risky and financially risky projects," Troika Dialog analyst Valery Nesterov said.
"The maximum terms they can offer are oil services contracts which are not especially rewarding as they don't secure additional oil supplies for the companies."
But Russian state controlled companies are unlikely to shut down investment or withdraw completely from Iran, holder of vast untapped oil and gas resources.
Russia's No. 2 oil producer, LUKOIL -- 20 percent owned by U.S. oil major ConocoPhillips -- has decreed a halt to its gasoline exports to fuel-hungry Iran.
But state controlled Gazprom has said it is bidding to develop the Azar oilfield and has expressed interest in Iran's giant South Pars field.
The Kremlin's influence in Tehran is a key lever of influence in its relationship with the United States and the European Union, which fear Tehran is seeking to create a nuclear bomb. Irandenies it is seeking nuclear weapons.
"There is an understanding that Russia needs to engage with Iran at some level," Weafer said. "The last thing the U.S. would actually want is for Tehran to end up only speaking to Beijing because that would limit U.S. back door access to Tehran."
(Reporting by Melissa Akin and Dmitry Zhdannikov; Editing by William Hardy)

BP and Iran Air end contract at Hamburg


July 13, 2010
Reuters
Oil major BP has ceased supplying jet fuel to Iran Air at Germany's Hamburg airport, both parties confirmed on Tuesday.
Two Iran Air aircraft were unable to refuel at the airport earlier this month and had to be diverted.
"We can confirm the contract finished at the end of June," sad a BP spokesman, without giving a reason. She declined to comment on whether BP has ended all contracts with the Iranian flagship carrier.
The confirmation follows reports that Iranian aircraft have been denied fuel in Germany, Britain and a Gulf Arab state as a result of the latest set of U.S. sanctions designed to heap pressure on the Islamic Republic over its nuclear program.
This was later denied by an Iranian official.
Iran Air's Germany manager Mohammad Reza Rajabi told Reuters he expected a new fuel agreement to be signed with a supplier in Hamburg "within a few days."
He declined to name the new supplier, adding that negotiations were underway.
Planes at other European airports are being fueled normally, he said.
"We do not have problems in other European airports, only there (Hamburg)...I think it will be a normal situation by next week."
Some aircraft which had not refueled at Hamburg have been diverted to Frankfurt and Vienna, he said.
Rival supplier Royal Dutch Shell plans to let its contracts to supply Iran Air with jet fuel lapse in response to the latest U.S. sanctions, an industry source said last week.
(By Michael Hogan and Emma FargeEditing by William Hardy)

Iranian scientist decides to return to Iran

July 13, 2010
Reuters
Iranian nuclear scientist Shahram Amiri, who vanished during a pilgrimage, turned up at Pakistan's embassy in Washington on Monday and has decided to return to Iran "of his own free will," a U.S. official said on Tuesday.
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE66C3KE20100713

Analysis: China's secretive money manager may be opening up


July 12, 2010
Reuters

It was a quiet day in U.S. debt market trading one day last December but participants felt something was amiss. Treasuries were selling off but the driving force behind the swoon remained a mystery.

An answer soon emerged: Traders were passing around a days-old news story containing a quote from a Chinese central bank official.

Zhu Min, the deputy governor of the People's Bank of China, had told an audience in Beijing that it would be "difficult" for foreign governments to buy U.S. Treasuries as the U.S. current account deficit shrank and the supply of dollars overseas decreased.

The 10-year U.S. Treasury note yield rose 14 basis points that day even though, on the surface at least, Zhu was simply pointing out a mechanical reality for central banks trying to manage their currency reserves. Still, U.S.-based traders saw a veiled warning; a potential signal that China would pull back from its heavy purchases in the Treasury market.

Traditionally, the Chinese government has dealt with the enormity of its influence on U.S. Treasuries by deploying elaborate smoke screens to hide its movements, infusing its Wall Street moves with an air of paranoia and heavy-handed control.

But banks and investors that work closely with China are seeing more sophistication in its fixed-income strategy, perhaps in a bid to become more transparent.

"They're in a league of their own in terms of size and growth rate of investment, so it behooves them to have that kind of predictability in their actions so as to not jeopardize their position in the process," said Robert Tipp, chief investment strategist at Prudential Fixed Income in New York.

China holds $900.2 billion in U.S. Treasuries.

As a result, Tipp said, "They are not a speedboat; they are an epically large tanker. It's very easy to see that everybody else in the water is watching them. If that boat has any sudden movements it could be very destabilizing for the markets."

A few recent actions by China's currency manager, the State Administration for Foreign Exchange (commonly called SAFE) -- an arm of the PBOC -- suggests to Wall Street that China is beginning to manage public expectations by relying less on ironclad secrecy and more on the nuanced telegraphing of purpose.

Last week, SAFE posted a series of questions and answers -- in Chinese -- on its website designed to reassure the world of its continuing interest in U.S. Treasury securities.

"Any increase or decrease in our holdings of U.S. Treasuries is a normal investment operation," read the answer to a question about whether SAFE would ever use its currency reserves as a "nuclear weapon.

In addition to this public gesture, SAFE's behavior on Wall Street, though it remains very secretive, may be shifting.

INVISIBLE ON WALL STREET

SAFE is a client prized above all others by primary dealers, the 18 firms in charge of buying U.S. debt directly from the government and selling it into the marketplace. This is big business that requires discretion.

The two dozen bankers Reuters interviewed at the large Wall Street firms, as well as lawyers and others that deal directly with China in the Treasury market, asked not to be quoted by name, fearing they would be fired or their firms would lose the Chinese government's business.

The bankers said China masks its Treasury market moves by employing different organizations to buy Treasuries on behalf of the Chinese government. While SAFE is the biggest, it is not the only one.

At times, smaller entities such as state-owned banks will ask for research or a view on a particular purchase and then a large agency such as SAFE will carry out that purchase. One banker at a primary dealer likened these test purchases to pilot programs, adding that they were an example of how centralized the decision-making is behind China's Treasury purchases.

Treasury purchasing orders are handed down from Beijing, and bankers at primary dealers say they have met more often with money managers in China than with anyone from SAFE in New York. Dealers who have visited Beijing describe SAFE's money managers as polite, professional, and at times tight-lipped.

One dealer noted that while Wall Street analysts and economists easily offer their opinions about the state of financial markets and the U.S. economy, SAFE officials almost never reveal their investment outlook.

SAFE's New York employees try to keep public contact to a minimum. A foreign exchange analyst who answered the phone at the New York SAFE office was friendly, and passed a curious Reuters reporter on to a U.S. Treasury strategist. But the situation quickly soured as the strategist, after a quick exchange in Chinese with another person in the room, slammed down the phone.

Part of the motivation for SAFE's secrecy is the threat of public disapproval in China. Criticism flared two years ago after China Investment Corp., another government investing arm, bought $3 billion in U.S. real estate firm Blackstone's shares at $31 each only to see them plunge below $10 a year later.

"The CIC's initial $3 billion investment in Blackstone has come under intense criticism in China for the disappointing performance of the company's shares since its listing," the Chinese financial news service Xinhua Financial reported in October 2008.

"The Chinese used to brag, 'We have $200 billion in foreign exchange. We have $500 billion. We have $1 trillion.' They don't brag anymore," said Derek Scissors, a China analyst at the Heritage Foundation in Washington.

"It's a political liability if there's a disastrous loss of money. That's why they store their reserves in Treasuries rather than higher-risk, higher-yield instruments."

The anxiety about public criticism extends to SAFE's physical appearance. Primary dealers who have met with SAFE officials in Beijing describe visits to a regular-looking office building that is separate from the main PBOC headquarters.

"China clearly didn't waste the people's money," one dealer said.

GROWING SOPHISTICATION

Dealers said SAFE is unwilling to take on much risk in its portfolio of dollar assets and sticks to the basics: Treasury bills and notes with maturities seldom longer than seven years. SAFE stays away from the more complicated interest rate derivatives other central banks like Brazil have embraced.

"They just have a clear mandate they have to follow and they don't ask any questions about whether that's the right thing or the wrong thing to do at the moment," said a primary dealer who has met with Chinese portfolio managers.

But some think SAFE's management style will soon change.

"There's this increasing sign of sophistication," Scissors said, noting that the announcement on SAFE's website seemed to be part of a trend of better interactions with the international financial community.

In late December, SAFE poached Changhong Zhu, the head of the derivatives desk at Pacific Investment Management Co. Zhu's departure from the mammoth fixed-income fund manager to his new role as chief investment officer at SAFE in Beijing was seen as a sign that SAFE was looking to bolster its operations with a more seasoned crew.

One dealer said Zhu's hiring signaled a desire for more cutting-edge fund management. Another added that SAFE's money managers were beginning to grow more conversant about their own strategies.

And while SAFE's New York operation plays a supporting role while Beijing makes the important strategy decisions, it's influence is growing. SAFE is hiring new money managers in New York and moved to its own offices in the Grace Building on 42nd Street and Avenue of the Americas about a year ago, after operating most recently out of the PBOC's main offices seven blocks farther uptown.

(By Emily Flitter, Editing by Philip Barbara)

Clinton to seek signs of progress in Afghanistan

July 16, 2010
Reuters



Secretary of State Hillary Clinton heads to Afghanistan next week for a crucial conference that U.S. officials hope will clarify the long-term goals of an expensive, unpopular and increasingly uncertain war.
Clinton will join dozens of other foreign ministers in Kabul on July 19-20 when Afghan President Hamid Karzai will detail plans to boost governance, security and economic opportunity in the face of relentless attacks by Taliban insurgents.
U.S. officials want the meeting to highlight Afghanistan's drive to take on more responsibility for its future, one key to President Barack Obama's pledge to begin drawing down U.S. forces in July 2011.
But it is also likely to underscore the breadth of the administration's challenge and deepen doubts among U.S. lawmakers before November's congressional elections that -- after nine years and $345 billion -- the Afghan war is lurching in the wrong direction.
"The conference may help give a sense, not only to America but also to its allies, of what the cost of completion will be in Afghanistan and what the roadmap is going forward," said Brian Katulis, an Afghan analyst at the liberal Center for American Progress, a Washington think tank.
"The key question is how does Afghanistan stand on its own. This could take us forward on how we define success."
Clinton will also hold talks in Pakistan, which is playing a key but mercurial role in Afghanistan even as it battles its own home-grown Islamist militants. She then heads to South Korea for talks on rising tensions with North Korea.
The White House said Obama's national security advisor, General Jim Jones, was in Kabul for talks with U.S. Ambassador Karl Eikenberry and General David Petraeus, named by Obama as the new top field commander for Afghanistan last month.
At the Kabul conference, aid packages and spending plans will top the agenda as officials seek to intensify civilian projects intended to buttress Obama's December decision to send 30,000 additional soldiers, bringing total U.S. troop presence in the country to almost 100,000 by this summer.
U.S. officials also expect progress in Karzai's campaign to woo Taliban fighters off the battlefield and to explore talks with more senior Taliban members aimed at finding a political settlement to the conflict.
Clinton and other U.S. officials support outreach to "reformed" Taliban who renounce violence, cut ties to al Qaeda and pledge allegiance to the government -- which would appear to rule out hardline Taliban leaders.
But how the process unfolds, and what political offers are made, could have a huge impact on what sort of state eventually emerges in Afghanistan and whether it is one the United States can live with.
DOUBTS GROW IN CONGRESS
Clinton's visit to Afghanistan follows a grim couple of months in the conflict, which has seen the U.S.-led international force of some 150,000 suffer increasing casualties and deteriorating security.
Obama also sacked his chief commander in Afghanistan, General Stanley McChrystal, over comments he made disparaging civilian leaders, and replaced him with Petraeus, the head of U.S. Central Command who is credited with helping to turn around the war in Iraq.
While Petraeus' appointment was widely welcomed, a sense of gloom has enveloped the U.S. Congress as lawmakers press for clearer answers on what the U.S. goals are in Afghanistan and when it intends to leave.
"Many people are asking whether we have the right strategy. Some suggest this is a lost cause ... This is the time to ask hard questions," Senator John Kerry, the powerful head of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said at a hearing.
Those questions will multiply as Obama's Democrats gird for November 2 congressional elections facing voters already angry over high unemployment and halting economic recovery.
"The war is certainly going to be a big campaign issue. The hope is that before the election the troop surge will be rolled out and there will be results to show," said Scott Worden, an Afghan analyst at the U.S. Institute of Peace.
"They are going to be looking hard for opportunities for optimism."
The Kabul conference follows a London meeting in January at which Karzai and his overseas partners agreed that Afghan forces should take the lead role in providing security in a number of provinces by late 2010 or early 2011.
It also committed foreign countries to support Afghanistan's efforts to develop the country -- although plans remain vague and dogged by charges of official Afghan corruption.
As U.S. casualties rise, some liberal Democrats are demanding a clearer exit plan. Republicans, meanwhile, have criticized the 2011 target date as a dangerous sign that the United States is not committed to victory in the war.
"The July 2011 withdrawal date has done tremendous damage to U.S. strategy and has undermined our position," said Lisa Curtis, an analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation. "They can recalibrate the withdrawal proposal. There is room to redefine it."
U.S. officials already appear to be doing that, promising that the scale and pace of any U.S. drawdown will be dictated by conditions on the ground -- a sign to both Karzai and the Taliban that the United States is ready to keep fighting.
(By Andrew Quinn, Editing by Patricia Wilson and Mohammad Zargham)

Panel urged to lift US oil drilling ban, new one issued

July 12, 2010
Reuters


* US presidential commission holds first public meeting

* It may consider issuing early guidance on drilling ban

* Commissioners uncertain of their role regarding ban (Adds comments from co-chair Reilly regarding ban)

By Ayesha Rascoe

NEW ORLEANS, July 12 (Reuters) - Gulf Coast lawmakers and oil industry officials on Monday argued against a moratorium on deepwater drilling on the same day the Obama administration issued a new ban on the practice in the wake of the BP Plc (BP.L) (BP.N) oil spill.

The new ban came during the first meeting of the National Commission on the BP Deepwater Horizon Spill and Offshore Drilling, the seven-person White House panel charged with making recommendations following the April 20 explosion of the Deepwater Horizon rig and subsequent leak.

Opponents of the ban urged the commission to advise the government to allow some drilling to proceed under new safety guidelines or the Gulf will suffer irreparable damage.

The worst oil spill in U.S. history prompted the Interior Department to place a six-month moratorium on U.S. deepwater exploratory drilling to give the commission time to recommend potential safety enhancements.

That moratorium was struck down by a federal court as too broad but the Interior Department issued another deepwater drilling ban on Monday that is set to last through Nov. 30. [ID:LDE66B0GF]

Despite appeals from drilling advocates, there seemed to be some uncertainty among the panel about what role it would play regarding the ban.

"The idea that we would have a near-term responsibility to recommend policy was not our understanding," said Bill Reilly, co-chair of the panel and former head of the Environmental Protection Agency.

Reilly said Interior Department Deputy Secretary David Hayes told him the department would make a decision on the moratorium "irrespective of us."

Earlier Bob Graham, former Florida senator and the panel's other co-chairman, said the commission could possibly issue interim guidance on deepwater drilling before its final report is due in six months.

The panel, which President Barack Obama established with an executive order, is modeled on commissions that looked into the 1986 space shuttle Challenger explosion and the Three Mile Island nuclear accident in 1979.

Larry Dickerson, president and chief executive of Diamond Offshore Drilling Inc (DO.N), told the committee a ban on deepwater drilling would be costly.

"We will have effectively given away a high-tech, high-wage industry that is U.S. dominated," said Dickerson, whose company is the largest U.S. driller and employs more than 11,000 people in the Gulf of Mexico.

Diamond is moving two of its rigs out of the Gulf due to the drilling ban and Dickerson said he sees a "slow motion" domino effect in the industry with future projects and jobs going to workers abroad.

Jay Collins, chief executive officer of oil fields services provider Oceaneering International Inc (OII.N), said his company has been hit by the moratorium and he expects the exodus of oil rigs from the Gulf to continue.

"Our analysis says five of those are likely to move out to foreign locations soon," he said.

Louisiana Senator Mary Landrieu disputed the idea that deepwater drilling is unsafe. "This Deepwater Horizon accident is an exception and not a rule and should be treated as such," Landrieu, a Democrat, told the panel.

(Additional reporting by Alexandria Sage; Editing by Bill Trott)
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSN12183528

US, S.Korea likely to approve new military exercises

July 14, 2010
Reuters



The United States and South Korea are likely to approve next week a series of joint military exercises, including naval and air exercises, in both the Sea of Japan and the Yellow Sea, the Pentagon said on Wednesday.

"We are not yet ready to discuss the precise details of those exercises but they will involve a wide range of assets and are expected to be initiated in the near future," Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell said.

The exercises will be discussed when U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates and U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton visit Seoul next week for bilateral talks, Morrell said.